Summary: Same algorithm using a new API.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14423509
fbshipit-source-id: c40f61fdd001f68785512c304941f523585d641c
Summary: The basic idea of the implementation is the same, but it uses the new method for finding parenting chain and it does not use `shared_from_this()` anymore.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14416949
fbshipit-source-id: 13ef928505a60280e2a6c30c76ac87d91cee326e
Summary:
The algorithm is quite simply:
1. Get family objects of the two nodes (inner and outer).
2. Traverse the list of family objects starting from the inner one and form a reversed list of them.
3. tarting from the inner node, traverse the tree layer-by-layer choosing a next element of the path by comparing the family object of each node on the level and an object from the list.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14416950
fbshipit-source-id: 23c659a9e01690f90174193650a2b0ef09eadb4d
Summary:
One of the core feature of ShadowNodeFamily is having a pointer to a parent family. This diff implements it.
I don't think there is a hard retain cycle there, but for more lean memory usage we use weak_ptr here.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14416948
fbshipit-source-id: 05fd2c4833146f007228363b1d958776b4a2a9cf
Summary:
ShadowNodeFamily is a new concept that allows us to implement an efficient way to solve the problem of finding a path to some ancestor node (practically reimplement ShadowNode::constructAncestorPath() in some efficient way).
This diff is the first one in the series. It introduces a new class and moves some data into it.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14416947
fbshipit-source-id: c93865a8929a2128498e34d3589487696aac6283
Summary: This is a leftover from the ealy days of Fabric. The mehtod does not have implementation counterpart and any usage.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14402636
fbshipit-source-id: aa2e919084ae7382d3a62af761e1f6eac334fc75
Summary: The removed code does nothing because we are replacing the oldChild with newChild several lines above.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14402637
fbshipit-source-id: 731a950f373e20f7d5bae3cbf6470335d3694ccc
Summary: In React, things like changing `tag`, `eventTarget` or reparenting are impossible by design. Which seems like a strange limitation actually allows us to do tremendous performance optimizations (stay tuned!).
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14402638
fbshipit-source-id: 3b7b7edaff0d55a3ca94e2ac4c753d630d07101d
Summary:
With recent changes, simple cloning a component does not mean that underlying Yoga node will be dirtied. Autodirtying is only performed if the child nodes were dirtied and/or if the YGStyles were changed.
That's not the case for Text component which does not have direct layotable children, so we have to call `dirtyLayout` explicitly.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14508277
fbshipit-source-id: 2c52d7d40da963a976c7d28a13781cc1755ef591
Summary: In methods which implement move semantic we have to check the source object because it's (also) being mutated.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14496937
fbshipit-source-id: f3f2299d14e41c8b269f1647336dbd5b45c235f4
Summary: More `assert`s and `ensureUnsealed` calls were added to YogaLayoutableShadowNode for simpler debugging and early failing.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14496936
fbshipit-source-id: 898c6a0665aeac5d0b1995bd53046f58cec37007
Summary:
If the `HasNewLayout` flag is `false`, we should not copy the data from YGStyle/YGLayout to ShadowNode because the node can be already sealed and because it's unnecessary. Previously we workaround this case with a special check in `setLayoutMetrics` method, but that can be unreliable because of some side-effects related to pixel rounding and comparing floats.
The new approach is much more robust and explicit.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14496939
fbshipit-source-id: deddb14d2206c5bd3f22154d0ea682e3c5888901
Summary: These default implementations are never being used. Removing them allowing to ensure that flags inside YGNode have same values as flags in YogaLayoutableShadowNode. That also saves a couple of bytes in size of ShadowNode.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14496938
fbshipit-source-id: c43f9c8a2eec054f728ff54a6573668eccda55fb
Summary:
As a comment above changed lines states, RootShadowNode is a special one because it layouts itself. In normal case some parent node layouts its children, and it also checks getHasNewLayout flag. So, in the case of RootShadowNode it has to check its own flag by itself.
That fix should save some resources and generally correct.
After the change, changing a state of some node does not cause relayout process. If dirtying is required, the component should call `dirtyLayout()` explicitly in the constructor or in `adopt` method.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14472751
fbshipit-source-id: 75bf62ac28991a39e5664aa71c08bd0e64fa275b
Summary: That diff fixes an obvious bug that prevents internal data of LayoutableShadowNode being cloned during cloning of YogaLayoutableShadowNode.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14472753
fbshipit-source-id: d07be3bf36708690dfe10de7898e2b48648aa0f4
Summary: In addition to the previous change, now we handle a situation where some node receives a new set of children and all those children have the same styles. (See the previous diff for more details.)
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14472754
fbshipit-source-id: 16411036e14f18e730e064e33948440b05ff51c8
Summary:
After the change, YogaLayoutableShadowNode will preserve dirty flag (being false) in cases where:
* a node was cloned with same children;
* changes in props don't affect layout.
Motivation:
In Fabric we always were aggressive about dirting yoga nodes: when we clone the node, we always dirty underlying Yoga node. I think that was the case because we don't deeply understand how the system works and we always had more severe problems to fix. Now, we faced an issue that forces us to think about that problem carefully (more about that later).
(I don't expect that will improve TTI performance, but that's possible if we do a lot of changes in the hierarchy during initial load process.)
I see two main use cases where we have to be smart about dirtied yoga nodes:
Case 1. Native local commits which do *not* modify yoga styles.E.g. in a case where ScrollView updates the internal state (which has offset info) really really frequently. (It will be implemented later.) That `contentOffset` info does not or might not affect layout, so we should not pay for this.
Case 2. Legit React commits which do *not* modify yoga styles. E.g. in a case where only the background color of some view changes, we don't need to relayout anything. Unfortunately, we do this in Fabric because of two major reasons:
* We don't make a difference between any changes in Props.
* React constructs new children of cloned node iteratively, calling `appendChild`. That makes implementing optimization really challenging because we don't know when the process ends. And when it ends we have very few pieces of information about how the state looked before.
This diff stack will handle the problems of the first kind. The main motivation is: we want to have state updates to be as lean as possible.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14472752
fbshipit-source-id: 68374f60cb07de9ab65bf1f6d94c828985359fa5
Summary:
Upgrade mobile `BUCK` and `.bzl` files to use C++14.
Let's see what happens.
Reviewed By: mzlee
Differential Revision: D14223329
fbshipit-source-id: ff642ca017103d9415c4d7f5beaf5ded07ef7ff1
Summary:
This is the couple of hacks I used after I finished #23802 in order to get fabric working on RNTester. This is inspired from prior work by kmagiera.
The goal of this PR is to show others what I’m struggling with, and to eventually merge it sans hacks.
- Yarn Install
- Uncomment the commented out pods in RNTester's pod file
- Open RNTesterPods workspace
- Run App
- this is only for pods, the non-pod RNTester will no longer work until updated with fabric too.
- `SurfaceHostingView` & `SurfaceHostingProxyRootView` both try to start the surface immediately, this leads to a race condition due to the javascript not having loaded yet, the hack here is:
1. Swizzle the `start` method on `RCTFabricSurface` to no-op when called.
2. Add observer for `RCTJavaScriptDidLoadNotification`
3. Call private method `_startAllSurfaces` on `_surfacePresenter` in AppDelegate when we receive `RCTJavaScriptDidLoadNotification`.
[General] [Added] - Use Fabric in RNTester
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23803
Reviewed By: shergin, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14450726
Pulled By: fkgozali
fbshipit-source-id: 8ae2d48634fecb60db539aaf0a2c89ba1f572c27
Summary: Several things need to ironed out: 1) LocalState in Fabric C++, 2) setting dimensions of BottomSheet component to 0,0 for parent.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14426167
fbshipit-source-id: 45a90a7971c87672872108a9e360926b4a6095f0
Summary:
Accidentally I noticed that the signature of Folly's hash_combine is different from boost's one.
The Folly's one is:
`size_t hash_combine(const T& t, const Ts&... ts)`, so the first argument is immutable and the method returns the result normally.
It means that all hashes that we compute in Fabric using `hash_combine` were `0`.
So I fixed it.
I have no idea why this difference exists, but some modern papers suggest that folly's variant has good chances to be standardized.
E.g.: http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2017/p0814r0.pdf
Technically, it should improve performance, but I doubt that it can be more than 1-2 ms per screen TTI.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14430380
fbshipit-source-id: 97da999ee5780b940bb789bc3eb5bf9f89c194ca
Summary:
While the proper typographical terminology is [Strikethrough](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strikethrough), we should still support `line-through` as it goes through a deprecation phase.
[iOS] [Added] - line-through support for fabric text components
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23911
Differential Revision: D14460610
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 0dae41b765f21d166ea3618c463ebe1330607b30
Summary:
Moves rn_codgen to rn_library behind a `codegen` flag to limit the number of rules we generate
WIth this, modules with native components can enable the react-native-codegen schema parsing by just updating their buck rule to:
```
rn_library(
name = 'lib',
codegen = True,
// ...
)
```
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D14401263
fbshipit-source-id: 1675bc28389db64da10153c988bb4eb00d715056
Summary: This diff is a part of an effort to resolve build errors that appear when compiling with the latest version of clang.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14369797
fbshipit-source-id: e4c6f53e293f336efad18597f9d2705c025e1051
Summary: The hope is that it will remove many unnececery allocations improving overal perfromance.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14249198
fbshipit-source-id: f0442b3919ccead0582a3190dea0e33d517d85f6
Summary:
SharedShadowNodeList is one of the core collections in Fabric. Every ShadowNode has one, it's used intensivly during diffing and so on.
Usually, nodes have a very few children, so using `small_vector` instead of regular `vector` should save us a lot of memory allocations.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14249201
fbshipit-source-id: 53297caa027a74099d0a1ed4a3cce78f8feb651b
Summary:
Nowadays, every ShadowNode has a reference to a ComponentDescriptor, so now there is no need to do registry lookup for that.
That should save us 0.5-1.0 ms in my non-scientific measurements.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14348369
fbshipit-source-id: 57f6a6f2f8bf0b7e58d89a414fec20b2db8876f7
Summary:
Clowntown.
This fixes a recent regression happened becasuse wrong order of parameters in ShadowViewMutation constructor.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14329164
fbshipit-source-id: 5a0dc04b889fb3357050b951d56c3e436dbeefb1
Summary: Use the codegen for the Slider component with the new `inferfaceOnly` option
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D14295981
fbshipit-source-id: 0482572892fbcffada43c7c6fbf17e70546300b8
Summary: These were moved to the codgen
Reviewed By: TheSavior
Differential Revision: D14307470
fbshipit-source-id: 49030c245f11bd595bb97e1b2f34a7c454be5c56
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializer in `LayoutMetrics.h`. This will help improve the portability of this file.
[General] [Changed] - Fabric: Remove designated initializer in LayoutMetrics.h
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23758
Differential Revision: D14320526
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 076ad389d0985d5213b521a2ffaca4ca7ae31599
Summary:
This pull request removes the use of the GCC extension null coalescing operators (`?:`) and replaces them with ternary operators. This improves the portability of `ShadowNode.cpp` (and enables MSVC to build it)
[General] [Fixed] - Fabric: Removed null coalescing operators in `ShadowNode`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23438
Differential Revision: D14304958
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 7d8e6778a72dabf09b1d99bc091a7578598b79c3
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializers in `RootShadowNode.cpp`. This will help improve the portability of this file.
[General] [Fixed] - Removed designated initializers in `RootShadowNode`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23715
Differential Revision: D14305167
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: e394580f103fdb59cf078828b5d2ee6df6cc534d
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializers under the `fabric/uimanager/` folder. This will help improve the portability of these files.
[General] [Fixed] - Removed designated initializers under the `fabric/uimanager/` folder
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23717
Differential Revision: D14305203
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 370911682e22cbb20c4bfd7382ed4da0ce1a598d
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializers in `ShadowNodeTest.cpp`. This will help improve the portability of this file.
[General] [Fixed] - Removed designated initializers in `ShadowNodeTest`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23714
Differential Revision: D14305162
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 81803652ece734a9b223d7a8b462a8b62cde7d1d
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializers in `ComponentDescriptorTest.cpp`. This will help improve the portability of this file.
[General] [Fixed] - Removed designated initializers in `ComponentDescriptorTest`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23713
Differential Revision: D14305123
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: 64cfc76dd7eaf74b4b4395bac18a9fc370a3b322
Summary:
I am not sure why it compiled before, it clearly should not, IMO. The `const` types (and references!) are not allowed inside `std::vector` because they are not assignable.
Some experiments that I did caused compilation errors here, so I am changing that to be actually correct.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14249199
fbshipit-source-id: 07a22ef13f5de9dfc7ab307493419e6006994bc2
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializers in `react/mounting/**` and `react/events/**` to improve portability.
A destructor was also defined for `ShadowView` to fix this error:
```
ShadowViewMutation.cpp:14: error: undefined reference to 'facebook::react::ShadowView::~ShadowView()'
ShadowViewMutation.cpp:24: error: undefined reference to 'facebook::react::ShadowView::~ShadowView()'
clang++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
```
[General] [Changed] - Fabric: Remove designated initializers in Events and Mounting
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23441
Differential Revision: D14298890
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: f5d8fc6e1f5968b94e8bb3ca0c3f0e81cf892f83
Summary: This diff removes the "isLayoutable" parameter from SchedulerDelegate.schedulerDidRequestPreliminaryViewAllocation. This now can be infered from the shadowView parameter
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14296481
fbshipit-source-id: b200504f9c2bef41f0a70257f1f5a274fbe97cbb
Summary: It can save us a couple of ms, hopefully.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14249196
fbshipit-source-id: b5911bcd8b49be66de7b9d2da660df38ef7cc8cd
Summary: That should reduce the size of `ShadowNode`, make an instantiation of shadowNode a bit faster, and make `clone` operation a bit faster because simple dynamic dispatch is faster than std::function invocation. It also should help a bit with code size.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14249200
fbshipit-source-id: c1332b139d27becebf15cd894475507b5fd0eb9f
Summary: We need this change to migrate away `cloneFunction` (to a pointer to ComponentDescriptor) inside ShadowNode.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14249197
fbshipit-source-id: 773edcf40e17989886e2c5d3955823a0dbf3857a
