change --- to --

This commit is contained in:
Jude Nelson
2018-02-22 18:14:36 -05:00
parent 34f45cde2d
commit 9812597b36
2 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Atlas is ideal for tasks like:
# Motivation
Atlas was designed to augment BNS. BNS allows each name to store a small
amount of state---on the order of 20 bytes. The size is so small because the
amount of state--on the order of 20 bytes. The size is so small because the
state must be recorded to a public blockchain, where the cost per byte is
high and the blockchain protocol limits the size of transactions.
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ While the Blockstack software stack expects that Atlas-hosted data is made up of
DNS zone files, Atlas itself does not enforce this (nor does it care about the
format of its chunks). It is designed as a general-purpose chunk store.
Nevertheless, the ubiquitous use of Atlas to store data as DNS zone files has
had an influence on its API design---fields and method names frequently allude
had an influence on its API design--fields and method names frequently allude
to zone files and zone file hashes. This is intentional.
The [public BNS API endpoint](https://core.blockstack.org) does not support
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ such that the attacker takes control over all of the chunk's hash buckets.
It can do so at any point in time after the chunk was first stored,
because only the peers who maintain the chunk's hash bucket have to store it.
This is a *fundamental* problem with structured overlay networks
that perform request routing based on content hash---they give the attacker
that perform request routing based on content hash--they give the attacker
insight as to the path(s) the queries take through the peer graph, and thus
reduce the number of paths the attacker must disrupt in order to censor the
chunk.
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ space).
The preferential attachment property means that an adaptive adversary can game the node's
neighbor selection algorithm by inserting malicious nodes that do not
forward routing or lookup requests. The attacker does not even have to eclipse
the victim node---the victim node will simply prefer to talk to the attacker's unhelpful nodes
the victim node--the victim node will simply prefer to talk to the attacker's unhelpful nodes
instead of helpful honest nodes. In doing so, the attacker can prevent honest peers from discovering each
other and each other's chunks.

View File

@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ At the time of this writing, by far the largest BNS namespace is the `.id`
namespace. Names in the `.id` namespace are meant for resolving user
identities. Short names in `.id` are more expensive than long names, and have
to be renewed by their owners every two years. Name registration fees are not
paid to anyone in particular---they are instead sent to a "black hole" where they are
paid to anyone in particular--they are instead sent to a "black hole" where they are
rendered unspendable (the intention is to discourage ID sqautters).
Unlike DNS, *anyone* can create a namespace and set its properties.
@@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ thing, since it prevents spammers from both filling up the blockchain with
garbage data and in turn prevents spammers from filling up BNS name databases with junk.
In addition to the transaction fee, BNS imposes a *registration fee*. Not all
names are created equal---some names are more desirable than others. BNS
names are created equal--some names are more desirable than others. BNS
uses the registration fee to ensure that more desirable names cost more, so they
are less likely to be squatted. In addition, the registration fee is an
incentive mechanism for developers to create and curate namespaces
@@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ the BNS peer needs to do so, and must know how to *reject* both invalid transact
as well as well-formed transactions from dishonest peers (i.e. peers that do not
follow the same consensus rules).
BNS nodes do not directly communicate with one another---by design, the set of
BNS nodes do not directly communicate with one another--by design, the set of
BNS peers is not enumerable. The only shared communication medium between BNS
peers is the blockchain.