Summary:
Previously we computed the list of nodes that need to be notified about layout changes using a list of mutation instructions. That was fine, but that's not really compatible with some other changes that I plan to make, so I decided to change it (make it better).
Besides the better design (debatable; fewer dependencies to unrelated moving pieces), here is why I believe the new way is more performant:
* The new approach has no `dynamic_casts`, whereas the previous has tons of them (two per a mutation). If a `dynamic_cast` takes 10 ns, for 500 nodes it can take up to 5ms only for casts. (Non-scientific assumption.)
* After removing dependency to mutation instruction, we can enable flattening for views which have `onLayout` event.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15110725
fbshipit-source-id: 31a657ccfd02441734ad1d71a833653223163289
Summary:
Trivial.
We are replacing rootTag with surfaceId according to the plan describing here: https://fb.workplace.com/groups/rn.fabric/permalink/1374002366064519/
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D15039134
fbshipit-source-id: ec8c3044f9f3f23939488bc01c66e9b653e651dd
Summary:
@public
In order to encapsulate property access on `YGStyle`, as a first measure we wrap all fields with accessors.
This will e.g. enable dynamic property storage and instrumentation in the future.
All accessors have a `const` version that allows direct access via `const&`. For mutation, bit fields are wrapped with a custom reference object.
This style allows for the least amount of changes in client code. Property access simply needs appended parens, eg `style.direction` becomes `style.direction`.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D14999096
fbshipit-source-id: fbf29f7ddab520513d4618f5e70094c4f6330b30
Summary: The basic idea of the implementation is the same, but it uses the new method for finding parenting chain and it does not use `shared_from_this()` anymore.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14416949
fbshipit-source-id: 13ef928505a60280e2a6c30c76ac87d91cee326e
Summary: The removed code does nothing because we are replacing the oldChild with newChild several lines above.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14402637
fbshipit-source-id: 731a950f373e20f7d5bae3cbf6470335d3694ccc
Summary:
As a comment above changed lines states, RootShadowNode is a special one because it layouts itself. In normal case some parent node layouts its children, and it also checks getHasNewLayout flag. So, in the case of RootShadowNode it has to check its own flag by itself.
That fix should save some resources and generally correct.
After the change, changing a state of some node does not cause relayout process. If dirtying is required, the component should call `dirtyLayout()` explicitly in the constructor or in `adopt` method.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14472751
fbshipit-source-id: 75bf62ac28991a39e5664aa71c08bd0e64fa275b
Summary:
This pull request removes the designated initializers in `RootShadowNode.cpp`. This will help improve the portability of this file.
[General] [Fixed] - Removed designated initializers in `RootShadowNode`
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/23715
Differential Revision: D14305167
Pulled By: shergin
fbshipit-source-id: e394580f103fdb59cf078828b5d2ee6df6cc534d
Summary: We need this change to migrate away `cloneFunction` (to a pointer to ComponentDescriptor) inside ShadowNode.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14249197
fbshipit-source-id: 773edcf40e17989886e2c5d3955823a0dbf3857a
Summary:
The previous implementation of the method cloned the root node twice (one time at the very end of the method and one time at the end of loop body).
The new one does it once and a bit more readable.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14187969
fbshipit-source-id: 9859deadd4b041ac115c37108188aab70200c75d
Summary: Now in BUCK file only, not in code.
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross
Differential Revision: D14019271
fbshipit-source-id: e1396be7156a374a1379a147ddecb83b51686121
Summary:
It's better to comment `DWITH_FBSYSTRACE` out in BUCK files instead of removing them from the code.
I'll publish the BUCK changes as separate diff for simpler backout in the future.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D14019272
fbshipit-source-id: 8b322b5c115efe33c15929e008b97a05220813df
Summary: All our C++ Fabric tests are cross-platform, so it makes sense to run them for all platforms (especially because platform may behaive differently).
Reviewed By: JoshuaGross, mdvacca
Differential Revision: D13984574
fbshipit-source-id: e384c03c7f9839be38a1910e04ba2f7725abc378
Summary: This is a temporary change to measure production data
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D13906807
fbshipit-source-id: 2a2f71aa379c4aca63c7bb4a9644704f713cb088
Summary:
Removing additional complexity from ShadowTree should help with maintainability. Now, this class is "tricky", but short at least.
With new `commit` API, it's much more simple and expected this way.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D13615365
fbshipit-source-id: 1fe851c1a2d3bdc7ac2f4a570cf0170eae3c4c67
Summary: Now it's parts of RootShadowNode and Scheduler.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D13615364
fbshipit-source-id: 13dbea1e69ef51b2679101915c01c6be7e15d859
Summary: Simple diff that adds a systrace to start measuring the calculation of Yoga layout() in Fabric
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D13124641
fbshipit-source-id: 6bd03e9f56524221f5d91606ffde50253673c1bb
Summary: We are moving to more stable APIs removing all mentiones of the effort name from the codebase.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D12912894
fbshipit-source-id: 4a0c6b9e7454b8b14e62d419e9e9311dc0c56e7a
Summary:
Trivial.
We have to proxy layout directions as well as min and max sizes to RootNode's Props to properly communicate the constrains to Yoga.
Reviewed By: sahrens
Differential Revision: D10387798
fbshipit-source-id: a02ec0a20b3ef28f6230738e5b3a4a2b0b8e0961
Summary:
All code styles are terribly ugly. We have the only choise - choise something and embrace it.
This particular code style was borrowed from a neibour Fabric-friendly project because it follows established Facebook guides and respects client-side traditions.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10218598
fbshipit-source-id: 8c4cf6713c07768566dadef479191661c79988f0
Summary:
The source of truth has already moved, so now we just need to fix references
This diff is mostly the result of running:
```
$ tools/mobile-unification/loadmod --fixup xplat/configurations/buck/apple/flag_defs.bzl tools/build_defs/apple/
```
Then I committed with `hg commit -I xplat/`
The controller you requested could not be found.
Differential Revision: D9772194
fbshipit-source-id: 93d23ae8e1c62440c7876cad965d963bde960db9
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
I was watching a classic magnificent talk about modern C++ by Herb Sutter and I was totally sold on double down on using `auto` in our codebase. Surprisingly, 95% of the code base already follows Herb's guidence; I just changed the last 5% to make it consistent.
All those changes must work *exactly* like it was before.
The talk: https://youtu.be/xnqTKD8uD64?t=28m25s
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9753301
fbshipit-source-id: 9629aa485a5d6e51806cc96306c297284d4f90b8
Summary: Unused loads hurt readability and take time to process.
Reviewed By: hramos
Differential Revision: D9494120
fbshipit-source-id: 455b56efadab1cb976344cffcb427772bfda2f71
Summary:
@public
Previously, all ConcreteShadowNode subclasses had to override `getComponentName()` function to specialize a name of the component. And often it was all that those subclasses do. Now, it's a template argument; and many ShadowNode classes can be created as oneliners via *just* specializing ConcreteShadowNode template.
Unfortunately, C++ does not allow to use `std::string`s or string literals as template arguments, but it allows to use pointers. Moreover, those pointers must point to some linked data, hence, those values must be declared in .cpp (not .h) files. For simplicity, we put those constants in Props classes, (but this is not a strong requirement).
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8942826
fbshipit-source-id: 4fd517e2485eb8f8c20a51df9b3496941856d8a5
Summary:
@public
There is no reason to have it inside View; it deserves that.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D8757012
fbshipit-source-id: 881b54008b51614cd203ab97811494fa7c30e4ef
