BREAKING CHANGE: ngClass and {{ class }} will now call the `setClass`
animation callback instead of addClass / removeClass when both a
addClass/removeClass operation is being executed on the element during the animation.
Please include the setClass animation callback as well as addClass and removeClass within
your JS animations to work with ngClass and {{ class }} directives.
Closes#6019
BREAKING CHANGE: Both the `$animate:before` and `$animate:after` DOM events must be now
registered prior to the $animate operation taking place. The `$animate:close` event
can be registered anytime afterwards.
DOM callbacks used to fired for each and every animation operation that occurs within the
$animate service provided in the ngAnimate module. This may end up slowing down an
application if 100s of elements are being inserted into the page. Therefore after this
change callbacks are only fired if registered on the element being animated.
If the first element in a template is a <tr>, <th>, <td>, or <tbody> tag,
the HTML compiler will ensure that the template is wrapped in a <table>
element so that the table content is not discarded.
Closes#2848Closes#1459Closes#3647Closes#3241
textInput shouldn't be applied to file inputs to ease writing of custom file input directives.
This change prevents file inputs from instantiating the text input parser/formatter pipelines.
Closes#6247Closes#6231
Because of a4e6d962, model is not updated on input/change between the
compositionstart and compositionend events. Unfortunately, the compositionend
event does not always happen prior to an input/change event.
This changeset calls the listener function to update the model after a
compositionend event is received.
Closes#6058Closes#5433
Previous link url is no longer served, responds with bad link (error 404). This change corrects the
URL to point to section 5.5 of the draft. The old URL appears to have been removed from service in
2012.
Corrects the link to "History API"
Closes#6225
When I was reading this doc I was thinking "but what about phonecatApp?" and when I looked in the
file from the step-11 branch there it is. Should be reflected in the docs as well
Closes#6209
CI builds on travis occasionally freak out because of the recursive use of process.nextTick, which
has been deprecated in Node relatively recently, to be replaced with setImmediate. Unfortunately,
this change does not resolve the issue. However, it does not hurt, either.
Closes#6161
Due to 339a165, it became impossible to filter nested properties of an object using the filterFilter.
A proposed solution to this was to enable the use of nested predicate objects. This change enables the
use of these nested predicate objects.
Example:
```html
<div ng-repeat="it in items | filter:{ address: { country: 'Canuckistan'}}"></div>
```
Or
```js
$filter('filter')(items, { address: { country: 'Canuckistan' } });
```
Closes#6215
Related to #6009
Since we now pass in the transclusion function directly to the link function, we no longer need
the old scheme whereby we saved the transclude function injected into the controller for later
use in during linking.
Additionally, this change may aid in correcting a memory leak of detached DOM nodes (see #6181
for details).
This commit removes the controller and simplifies ngTransclude.
Closes#5375Closes#6181
The documentation states only the "action" attribute triggers this, which is incorrect. When using
the attribute "data-action" (as for AJAX control, attempting to bypass the "action" attribute but
still make it obvious what its for), Angular thinks this is also classified as "action" and
continues with the page submission.
Closes#6196
This corrects a complicated compiler issue, described in detail below:
Previously, if an element transclusion directive contained an asynchronous directive whose template
contained another element transclusion directive, the inner element transclusion directive would be
linked with the element, rather than the expected comment node.
An example manifestation of this bug would look like so:
```html
<div ng-repeat="i in [1,2,3,4,5]">
<div my-directive>
</div>
</div>
```
`my-directive` would be a replace directive, and its template would contain another element
transclusion directive, like so:
```html
<div ng-if="true">{{i}}</div>
```
ngIf would be linked with this template content, rather than the comment node, and the template element
would be attached to the DOM, rather than the comment. As a result, this caused ng-if to duplicate the
template when its expression evaluated to true.
Closes#6006Closes#6101
This reverts commit 64d58a5b52.
For some weird reason this is causing regressions at Google.
I'm not sure why and I'm running out of time to investigate, so I'm taking
a safe route here and reverting the commit since it's just a refactoring.
We did this due to travis-ci/travis-ci#1293 but since it's possible that this hack is not needed, I'm removing it.
If it turns out that we do need it still then we should ping the travis issue and revert this commit
The flushNext method of testing is difficult and highly coupled with the behavior
of ngAnimate's $animate workflow. It is much better instead to just queue all
$animate animation calls into a queue collection which is available on the $animate
service when mock.animate is included as a module within test code.
