Previously, the compiler would throw an error if a directive requested new non-isolate scope
after a directive had requested isolate scope. But it would not error if a directive
requested an isolate scope after a directive had requested a new non-isolate scope.
Since it is invalid to have more than one directive request any kind of scope if one of
them has requested isolate scope, then the compiler should error whatever order the
directives are applied.
This fix addresses this situation by throwing error regardless of order of directives.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Requesting isolate scope and any other scope on a single element is an error.
Before this change, the compiler let two directives request a child scope
and an isolate scope if the compiler applied them in the order of non-isolate
scope directive followed by isolate scope directive.
Now the compiler will error regardless of the order.
If you find that your code is now throwing a `$compile:multidir` error,
check that you do not have directives on the same element that are trying
to request both an isolate and a non-isolate scope and fix your code.
Closes#4402Closes#4421
This adds a scope event notification when a template fails to load.
This can have performance implications, and unfortunately cannot at this moment
be terminated with preventDefault(). But it's nice to be notified when problems
occur!
Closes#5803
When an observer is set to listen on the pattern, minlength or maxlength attributes
via $attrs then the observer will also listen on the ngPattern, ngMinlength and the
ngMaxlength attributes as well.
Closes#7758
Since ngShow/ngHide animations add and remove the .ng-hide class, having to remember
to write display:block on your own is a hassle and leads to problematic animation
code. This fix places a default on the animation for you instead.
Closes#3813
jQuery needs to be loaded before *all* AngularJS modules in the app,
because otherwise AngularJS will not detect the presence of jQuery and
animations will not work as expected.
The documentation on context is incorrect and misleading:
1. "Angular expressions must use $window explicitly to refer to the global
`window` object": expressions cannot access `$window`
1. The example doesn't actually attempt to use $window in a expression. It's in a
function called from an expression, which incorrectly implies to readers that:
1. functions ARE expressions
1. functions called by expressions can't access `window`
Here's [a plunkr](http://plnkr.co/edit/Gd4xAV?p=preview) to make both these issues clear.
This change fixes the errors and informs the reader about Angular's `$window` etc services,
and adds an explicit example of an expression not being able to access `window`.
