Summary: We are moving to more stable APIs removing all mentiones of the effort name from the codebase.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D12912894
fbshipit-source-id: 4a0c6b9e7454b8b14e62d419e9e9311dc0c56e7a
Summary: ImageManager is used to update the LocalData of Image views, as part of this process we call ImageManager::requestImage in cross platform code. Event if Android doesn't use ImageRequest we need to return an empty non-operation version of this object.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D10429663
fbshipit-source-id: 3621ece72f7291e2e6ab6a84b238ac16b595fc18
Summary: This diff fixes the release of ImageRequest object. The responseFutureSplitter_ can be destroyed by the time ~ImageRequest is executed. See P60163877 for original crash (this crash was reproducible when reloading or closing a Fabric screen that contains several images.
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D10282207
fbshipit-source-id: 4f0894959e54f6d15b98e216df102e764866e387
Summary: This is the second and the final part of adopting clang-format.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10229624
fbshipit-source-id: d97670b716800ea2488b84bd0aacaf54d8bd2e31
Summary:
All code styles are terribly ugly. We have the only choise - choise something and embrace it.
This particular code style was borrowed from a neibour Fabric-friendly project because it follows established Facebook guides and respects client-side traditions.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D10218598
fbshipit-source-id: 8c4cf6713c07768566dadef479191661c79988f0
Summary: This diff adds support for image views in Android
Reviewed By: shergin
Differential Revision: D9757712
fbshipit-source-id: 8d33e04c8ac4a670af6ca49bb3b9dccc69d52e40
Summary:
The spec says that `bridge_transfer` indicates that we "transfer ownership of the pointer" to ARC which implies that as soon this part of the code does not need the object, it will be deallocated. However, that's not what we want here. This object is actually already owned by another ARC-powered code somewhere else and the pointer to it was transferred as a raw pointer through the C++ world.
So, we want to keep the ownership of the object on the other side but still imply the lifetime of the object. So how can we do that? Simple, we have to use `bridge`.
Why? ARC is not magical, it's just automatic ref counting. And I think the only difference between `bridge` and `bridge_transfer` is how many refcounter's bumps will be added to the generated code. In the case of `bridge_transfer` it is zero, in the case of `bridge` it is one. So, initializing a new Objective-C variable that points to the shared resource we have to bump the counter once, so we have to use `bridge`.
Reviewed By: mdvacca
Differential Revision: D9819405
fbshipit-source-id: 9e7af343917ec4407a64d884402b10ee2a8097f9
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
@public
ImageManager coordinates all work related to loading image bitmaps for <Image> component.
The particular iOS implementation uses RCTImageLoader from RCTImage module under the hood.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D8526571
fbshipit-source-id: a0d927972d30113eed6e0cd169fceee17610181d
