Change the error message for a circular dependency to display the full
circle back to the first service being instantiated, so that the problem
is obvious. The previous message stopped one dependency short of the full
circle.
Changes the content of the cdep error message, which may be considered
a breaking change.
Closes#7500
$http was previously checking cookies to find an xsrf-token prior to checking
the cache. This caused a performance penalty of about 2ms, which can be very
significant when loading hundreds of template instances on a page.
Fixes#7717
Sets the ngModel controller property $touched to True and $untouched to False whenever a 'blur' event is triggered over a control with the ngModel directive.
Also adds the $setTouched and $setUntouched methods to the NgModelController.
References #583
Previously, the compiler would throw an error if a directive requested new non-isolate scope
after a directive had requested isolate scope. But it would not error if a directive
requested an isolate scope after a directive had requested a new non-isolate scope.
Since it is invalid to have more than one directive request any kind of scope if one of
them has requested isolate scope, then the compiler should error whatever order the
directives are applied.
This fix addresses this situation by throwing error regardless of order of directives.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Requesting isolate scope and any other scope on a single element is an error.
Before this change, the compiler let two directives request a child scope
and an isolate scope if the compiler applied them in the order of non-isolate
scope directive followed by isolate scope directive.
Now the compiler will error regardless of the order.
If you find that your code is now throwing a `$compile:multidir` error,
check that you do not have directives on the same element that are trying
to request both an isolate and a non-isolate scope and fix your code.
Closes#4402Closes#4421
This adds a scope event notification when a template fails to load.
This can have performance implications, and unfortunately cannot at this moment
be terminated with preventDefault(). But it's nice to be notified when problems
occur!
Closes#5803
When an observer is set to listen on the pattern, minlength or maxlength attributes
via $attrs then the observer will also listen on the ngPattern, ngMinlength and the
ngMaxlength attributes as well.
Closes#7758
Since ngShow/ngHide animations add and remove the .ng-hide class, having to remember
to write display:block on your own is a hassle and leads to problematic animation
code. This fix places a default on the animation for you instead.
Closes#3813
It's not a bad example of sorting fields in a table, which is something people are frequently wanting
to do. So I say, LGTM!
~caitp, 1988-2014
Closes#7602
Fix property name that introduced a bug that occurs when there are 2 animations per page
with similar signature. Due to mistype they were assigned same cache key so second
animation was processed incorrectly
Closes#7566
Nested isolated transclude directives.
This improves/fixes the fix in d414b78717.
See the changed ng-ifunit test: The template inside ng-if should be bound to the
isolate scope of `iso` directive (resp. its child scope). Not to a child of
the root scope. This shows the issue with ng-if. It’s however problem with
other directives too.
Instead of remembering the scope, we pass around the bound parent transclusion.
This issue was introduced in b87e5fc092.
The state for each row has to be set up *before* linking.
The cloneFn (the function passed into $transclude) is called *before* actual linking and thus it is enough to update the state inside the cloneFn callback.
If a directive provides a template but is not explicitly requesting transclusion
then the compiler should not pass a transclusion function to the directives
within the template.
The boundTransclusionFn that is passed in is really the one from the
parent node. The change to parentBoundTranscludeFn clarifies this compared
to the childBoundTranscludeFn.
If you have two directives that both expect to receive transcluded content
the outer directive works but the inner directive never receives a
transclusion function. This only failed if the first transclude directive
was not the first directive found in compilation.
Handles the regression identified in e994259739Fixes#7240Closes#7387
