Update parent and child scopes correctly when a '='-binding changes from a NaN value.
TBR by angular-core
Closes#8553Closes#8554
Conflicts:
test/ng/compileSpec.js
Previously, <element ng-attr-foo="{{binding}}" foo="bar"></element>'s "foo" attribute would always
equal "bar", because the bound version was overwritten. This CL corrects this behaviour and ensures
that the ordering of attributes does not have an effect on whether or not ng-attr-bound attributes
do their work.
If a "replace" directive has an async template, which contains a transclusion
directive at its root node, then outer transclusions were failing to be
passed to this directive. An example would be uses of `ngIf` inside and
outside the template.
Collaborated with @caitp
Closes#7183Closes#7772
If a directive provides a template but is not explicitly requesting transclusion
then the compiler should not pass a transclusion function to the directives
within the template.
If you have two directives that both expect to receive transcluded content
the outer directive works but the inner directive never receives a
transclusion function. This only failed if the first transclude directive
was not the first directive found in compilation.
Handles the regression identified in e994259739Fixes#7240Closes#7387
If a directives specifies `replace:true` and the template of the directive contains
a root element with an attribute which already exists at the place
where the directive is used with the same value, don't duplicate the value.
Closes#7463
If you have two directives that both expect to receive transcluded content
the outer directive works but the inner directive never receives a
transclusion function. This only failed if the first transclude directive
was not the first directive found in compilation.
Fixes#7240Closes#7387
All isolated scope directives that do not have `templateUrl` were marked
as `$isolateScopeNoTemplate` even if they did have a `template` attribute.
This caused `jqLite#scope()` to return the wrong value for child elements
within the directive's template.
Closes#6942
Previously, ctreq would possibly reference the incorrect directive name,
due to relying on a directiveName living outside of the closure which
throws the exception, which can change before the call is ever made.
This change saves the current value of directiveName as a property of
the link function, which prevents this from occurring.
Closes#7062Closes#7067
BREAKING CHANGE: ngClass and {{ class }} will now call the `setClass`
animation callback instead of addClass / removeClass when both a
addClass/removeClass operation is being executed on the element during the animation.
Please include the setClass animation callback as well as addClass and removeClass within
your JS animations to work with ngClass and {{ class }} directives.
Closes#6019
If the first element in a template is a <tr>, <th>, <td>, or <tbody> tag,
the HTML compiler will ensure that the template is wrapped in a <table>
element so that the table content is not discarded.
Closes#2848Closes#1459Closes#3647Closes#3241
This corrects a complicated compiler issue, described in detail below:
Previously, if an element transclusion directive contained an asynchronous directive whose template
contained another element transclusion directive, the inner element transclusion directive would be
linked with the element, rather than the expected comment node.
An example manifestation of this bug would look like so:
```html
<div ng-repeat="i in [1,2,3,4,5]">
<div my-directive>
</div>
</div>
```
`my-directive` would be a replace directive, and its template would contain another element
transclusion directive, like so:
```html
<div ng-if="true">{{i}}</div>
```
ngIf would be linked with this template content, rather than the comment node, and the template element
would be attached to the DOM, rather than the comment. As a result, this caused ng-if to duplicate the
template when its expression evaluated to true.
Closes#6006Closes#6101
The flushNext method of testing is difficult and highly coupled with the behavior
of ngAnimate's $animate workflow. It is much better instead to just queue all
$animate animation calls into a queue collection which is available on the $animate
service when mock.animate is included as a module within test code.
Previously, classes added to asynchronous directive elements during the clone
attach function would not persist after the node is merged with the template, prior
to linking. This change corrects this behaviour and brings it in line with synchronous
directives.
Closes#5439Closes#5617
FF 26.0 now throws:
"TypeError: NodeList doesn't have an indexed property setter."
when we try to assign to `childNodes[1]`, since this test still works properly
on Chrome and the issue being tested is not a cross-browser issues, I'm
just making the patchability check more robust instead of trying to figure
out how to make this test fully pass on FF.
It appears that this exceptional case was only valid for IE<8 and that for IE>=8 it
was actually causing a bug with the `ng-href-attr` directive on `<a>` elements.
Closes#5479
jQuery's elem.html('') is way slower than elem.empty(). As clearing
element contents happens quite often in certain scenarios, switching
to using .empty() provides a significant performance boost when using
Angular with jQuery.
Closes#4457
When a component uses an isolate scope reference
and the the component is used with an object literal
a new object is created on every evaluation.
Therefore the compiler needs to compare
the values of the parent and the isolate scope
using object equality and not object reference
equality.
Fixes#5296.
If an element has a directive whose content is loaded using `templateUrl`,
and the element is cloned using a linking function before the template arrives,
the clone needs to be updated as well.
This also updates `ngIf` and `ngRepeat` to keep the connection to the clone
of a tranclude function, so that they know about the changes a directive with
`templateUrl` does to the element in the future.
Fixes to #4930.
When using two-way binding with isolate scope, under some circumstances
the lastValue variable captured in the parentValueWatch function can get
out of sync.
Specifically, if both the value in the origin scope as well as the value
in the isolate scope get independently updated to the same value within
one digest cycle, the lastValue is never updated. This potentially causes
the watch to make the wrong decision as to which side to update on subsequent
passes.
This fixes things by ensuring lastValue is always set to the last seen
value even if the watch's logic was short circuited because there was no
difference between the values in the original and isolate scopes.
Closes#5182
`$sanitize` now uses the same mechanism as `$compile` to validate uris.
By this, the validation in `$sanitize` is more general and can be
configured in the same way as the one in `$compile`.
Changes
- Creates the new private service `$$sanitizeUri`.
- Moves related specs from `compileSpec.js` into `sanitizeUriSpec.js`.
- Refactors the `linky` filter to be less dependent on `$sanitize`
internal functions.
Fixes#3748.
When $compile interpolates a CSS class attribute expression it will
do so by comparing the CSS class value already present on the element.
This may lead to unexpected results when dealing with ngClass values being
added and removed therefore it is best that both compile and ngClass delegate
addClass/removeClass operations to the same block of code.
Additional API (backwards compatible)
- Injects `$transclude` (see directive controllers) as 5th argument to directive link functions.
- `$transclude` takes an optional scope as first parameter that overrides the
bound scope.
Deprecations:
- `transclude` parameter of directive compile functions (use the new parameter for link functions instead).
Refactorings:
- Don't use comment node to temporarily store controllers
- `ngIf`, `ngRepeat`, ... now all use `$transclude`
Closes#4935.
See doc update in the diff for more info.
BREAKING CHANGE: jqLite#scope() does not return the isolate scope on the element
that triggered directive with isolate scope. Use jqLite#isolateScope() instead.
When an isolate scope directive is also a "replace" directive and at the root of its template
it has other directives, we need to keep track remember to use isolate scope when linking
these.
This commit fixes the leakage of this state when this directive is used again later inside
or outside of the isolate directive template.
Fixes an issue when we didn't share the isolate scope with the controller
of the directive from the isolate directive's template when this directive
was replaced onto the isolate directive element.
I had to fix one unit test, as it assumed the broken behavior, where application template gets the
isolate scope of other (isolate) directive, rather than the regular scope.
BREAKING CHANGE: Child elements that are defined either in the application template or in some other
directives template do not get the isolate scope. In theory, nobody should rely on this behavior, as
it is very rare - in most cases the isolate directive has a template.
Fixes issue with isolate scope leaking all over the place into other directives on the same element.
Isolate scope is now available only to the isolate directive that requested it and its template.
A non-isolate directive should not get the isolate scope of an isolate directive on the same element,
instead they will receive the original scope (which is the parent scope of the newly created isolate scope).
Paired with Tobias.
BREAKING CHANGE: Directives without isolate scope do not get the isolate scope from an isolate directive on the same element. If your code depends on this behavior (non-isolate directive needs to access state from within the isolate scope), change the isolate directive to use scope locals to pass these explicitly.
// before
<input ng-model="$parent.value" ng-isolate>
.directive('ngIsolate', function() {
return {
scope: {},
template: '{{value}}'
};
});
// after
<input ng-model="value" ng-isolate>
.directive('ngIsolate', function() {
return {
scope: {value: '=ngModel'},
template: '{{value}}
};
});
Closes#1924Closes#2500
Recently we changed the priority of attribute interpolation directive to -100
to ensure that it executes early in the post linking phase. This causes issues
with when terminal directives are placed on elements with attribute bindings
because the terminal directive will usually have 0 or higher priority which
results in attr interpolation directive not being applied to the element.
To fix this issue I'm switching the priority back to 100 and making moving the
binding setup into the pre-linking function.
This means that:
- terminal directives with priority lower than 100 will not affect the attribute
binding
- if a directive wants to add or alter bindings it can do so in the pre-linking
phase, as long as the priority of this directive is more than 100
- all post-linking functions will execute after the attribute binding has been
set up
- all pre-linking functions with directive priority lower than 100 will execute
after the attribute bindings have been setup
BREAKING CHANGE: the attribute interpolation (binding) executes as a directive
with priority 100 and the binding is set up in the pre-linking phase. It used
to be that the priority was -100 in rc.2 (100 before rc.2) and that the binding
was setup in the post-linking phase.
Closes#4525Closes#4528Closes#4649
When we re-enter compilation either due to async directive templates or element transclude directive
we need to keep track of controllers to instantiate during linking.
This piece of info was missing when re-entering compilation and that's what this commit fixes.
I also reordered the properties in the previousCompileContext object.
Closes#4434Closes#4616
Issue an error and abort compilation when two directives that ask for transclusion are found
on a single element. This configuration is not supported and we previously failed to issue
the error because in the case of element transclusion the compilation is re-started and this
caused the compilation context to be lost.
The ngRepeat directive has been special-cased to bypass this warning because it knows how to
handle this scenario internally.
This is not an ideal solution to the problem of multiple transclusions per element, we are
hoping to have this configuration supported by the compiler in the future. See #4357.
Closes#3893Closes#4217Closes#3307
Objects received from outside AngularJS may have had their `hasOwnProperty`
method overridden with something else. In cases where we can do this without
incurring a performance penalty we call directly on Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty
to ensure that we use the correct method.
Also, we have some internal hash objects, where the keys for the map are provided
from outside AngularJS. In such cases we either prevent `hasOwnProperty` from
being used as a key or provide some other way of preventing our objects from
having their `hasOwnProperty` overridden.
BREAKING CHANGE: Inputs with name equal to "hasOwnProperty" are not allowed inside
form or ngForm directives.
Before, inputs whose name was "hasOwnProperty" were quietly ignored and not added
to the scope. Now a badname exception is thrown.
Using "hasOwnProperty" for an input name would be very unusual and bad practice.
Either do not include such an input in a `form` or `ngForm` directive or change
the name of the input.
Closes#3331
