Changed "you would currently have to write" to "you would otherwise have to write".
Seems to make more sense this way since "currently" presupposes that someone new
to Angular would be coming from a different paradigm, which they may or may not be.
Closes#9428
The trick with setting `<base href=".">` has not worked since Angular 1.2.0.
It is also misleading that it talks about `$routeProvider.otherwise`
which is not important in this case.
Related to #8869Closes#8908
The draggable example does not work as expected in Chrome (37.0.2062.124 m).
The span disappears when dragged beyond what appears to be a small area.
Changing the span to a block element (with a width of 65px) resolves this issue.
An alternative solution would be to change the span to a div.
Fix the "correct" example to have the proper syntax for creating the locals
object and provide a more explicit explanation as to how the scope object
should be provided.
The conclusion table incorrectly states that services can not create functions.
New table row added to separate "can create functions" and "can create primitives".
Helpful for people new to Angular to see the ng-app declaration in context with the expression
example. This will help illustrate the "Important thing to notice" point which follows: "The
reference to myApp module in <html ng-app="myApp">. This is what bootstraps the app using your
module."
Closes#8673
1) The original document is not clear to a new developer in where to place the code.
2) The query.clear() statement to clear the query before the second test is missing in the original document.
3) Refactored to use the query and phoneList variables in both tests, so its easier to read and understand.
Closes#7815
This line was missing an 'as'
Previous:
We also have to add the modules dependencies of our app. By listing these two modules as dependencies of `phonecatApp`, ...
New:
We also have to add the modules *as* dependencies of our app.
Closes#8345
The "A first example: Data binding" section it implies that the `required` directive is
doing something, but it isn't.
I just removed the parts the refer to the required directive to avoid confusion.
Highlighted the Best Practices section, and took the styling from the Services doc.
Also removed some superfluous wording that was in the "Provider Recipe"
