The documentation on context is incorrect and misleading:
1. "Angular expressions must use $window explicitly to refer to the global
`window` object": expressions cannot access `$window`
1. The example doesn't actually attempt to use $window in a expression. It's in a
function called from an expression, which incorrectly implies to readers that:
1. functions ARE expressions
1. functions called by expressions can't access `window`
Here's [a plunkr](http://plnkr.co/edit/Gd4xAV?p=preview) to make both these issues clear.
This change fixes the errors and informs the reader about Angular's `$window` etc services,
and adds an explicit example of an expression not being able to access `window`.
The updated Closure I18N code relies on these methods to enhance the localization quality.
This fix prevents ngLocale files from referencing undefined values. In the short term, this
means adding references to versions of these methods in locales where they are necessary.
It's not a bad example of sorting fields in a table, which is something people are frequently wanting
to do. So I say, LGTM!
~caitp, 1988-2014
Closes#7602
When including the ng-resource module you appear to need to add a reference to the karma config file
as well or the unit tests will fail. This burned me for a while when going through the tutorial.
Closes#7651
The old seems to link to the source code of I18N. Found the same folder on their new Github repo.
"Closure Library's source repository has moved to GitHub.", https://code.google.com/p/closure-library/Closes#7638
Fix property name that introduced a bug that occurs when there are 2 animations per page
with similar signature. Due to mistype they were assigned same cache key so second
animation was processed incorrectly
Closes#7566
Nested isolated transclude directives.
This improves/fixes the fix in d414b78717.
See the changed ng-ifunit test: The template inside ng-if should be bound to the
isolate scope of `iso` directive (resp. its child scope). Not to a child of
the root scope. This shows the issue with ng-if. It’s however problem with
other directives too.
Instead of remembering the scope, we pass around the bound parent transclusion.
This issue was introduced in b87e5fc092.
The state for each row has to be set up *before* linking.
The cloneFn (the function passed into $transclude) is called *before* actual linking and thus it is enough to update the state inside the cloneFn callback.
If a directive provides a template but is not explicitly requesting transclusion
then the compiler should not pass a transclusion function to the directives
within the template.
The boundTransclusionFn that is passed in is really the one from the
parent node. The change to parentBoundTranscludeFn clarifies this compared
to the childBoundTranscludeFn.
If you have two directives that both expect to receive transcluded content
the outer directive works but the inner directive never receives a
transclusion function. This only failed if the first transclude directive
was not the first directive found in compilation.
Handles the regression identified in e994259739Fixes#7240Closes#7387
Using `controller as` in the template is not described well
in the docs, as both `scope` injection and `this` are presented
equally without too much discussion of the advantages of using
either. I added a bit more discussion based on google's internal
style guidelines.
Closes#7591Closes#5076 (until Angular 2.0 comes out and we refactor everything)
$route.name.scope.current returns undefined in the docs example,
as scope is never injected into the relevant controller.
Scope doesn't need to be there, so it's best to just remove it.
Suggested in #5076.
