It's not a bad example of sorting fields in a table, which is something people are frequently wanting
to do. So I say, LGTM!
~caitp, 1988-2014
Closes#7602
Fix property name that introduced a bug that occurs when there are 2 animations per page
with similar signature. Due to mistype they were assigned same cache key so second
animation was processed incorrectly
Closes#7566
Nested isolated transclude directives.
This improves/fixes the fix in d414b78717.
See the changed ng-ifunit test: The template inside ng-if should be bound to the
isolate scope of `iso` directive (resp. its child scope). Not to a child of
the root scope. This shows the issue with ng-if. It’s however problem with
other directives too.
Instead of remembering the scope, we pass around the bound parent transclusion.
This issue was introduced in b87e5fc092.
The state for each row has to be set up *before* linking.
The cloneFn (the function passed into $transclude) is called *before* actual linking and thus it is enough to update the state inside the cloneFn callback.
If a directive provides a template but is not explicitly requesting transclusion
then the compiler should not pass a transclusion function to the directives
within the template.
The boundTransclusionFn that is passed in is really the one from the
parent node. The change to parentBoundTranscludeFn clarifies this compared
to the childBoundTranscludeFn.
If you have two directives that both expect to receive transcluded content
the outer directive works but the inner directive never receives a
transclusion function. This only failed if the first transclude directive
was not the first directive found in compilation.
Handles the regression identified in e994259739Fixes#7240Closes#7387
Using `controller as` in the template is not described well
in the docs, as both `scope` injection and `this` are presented
equally without too much discussion of the advantages of using
either. I added a bit more discussion based on google's internal
style guidelines.
Closes#7591Closes#5076 (until Angular 2.0 comes out and we refactor everything)
$route.name.scope.current returns undefined in the docs example,
as scope is never injected into the relevant controller.
Scope doesn't need to be there, so it's best to just remove it.
Suggested in #5076.
Transitions that are run through ngAnimate which contain a specific property
cause any inline styles to be erased after the animation is done. This has
something to do with how the browsers handle transitions that do not use
"all" as a transition property.
Closes#7503
Expressions that start with `::` will be binded once. The rule
that binding follows is that the binding will take the first
not-undefined value at the end of a $digest cycle.
Watchers from $watch, $watchCollection and $watchGroup will
automatically stop watching when the expression(s) are bind-once
and fulfill.
Watchers from text and attributes interpolations will
automatically stop watching when the expressions are fulfill.
All directives that use $parse for expressions will automatically
work with bind-once expressions. E.g.
<div ng-bind="::foo"></div>
<li ng-repeat="item in ::items">{{::item.name}};</li>
Paired with: Caitlin and Igor
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fTqaaQYD2QE1rz-OywvRKFSpZirbWUPsnfaZaMq8fWI/edit#Closes#7486Closes#5408
The feature has been deprecated in #4317
BREAKING CHANGE: promise unwrapping has been removed.
It has been deprecated since 1.2.0-rc.3.
It can no longer be turned on.
Two methods have been removed:
* $parseProvider.unwrapPromises
* $parseProvider.logPromiseWarnings
BREAKING CHANGE:
The `replace` flag for defining directives that
replace the element that they are on will be removed in the next
major angular version.
This feature has difficult semantics (e.g. how attributes are merged)
and leads to more problems compared to what it solves.
Also, with WebComponents it is normal to have custom elements in the DOM.
If a directives specifies `replace:true` and the template of the directive contains
a root element with an attribute which already exists at the place
where the directive is used with the same value, don't duplicate the value.
Closes#7463
The documentation and code example of $http interceptors is unclear about whether config can be null
or not, and whether the result should always be a promise or not. This pr clears up the documentation
a bit and removes the literal 'or a promise' interpretation of the docs in the code example.
Closes#7431Closes#7460
