GitBook: [#177] No subject

This commit is contained in:
Alex Daddy
2023-01-05 09:57:57 +00:00
committed by gitbook-bot
parent 4f62eea508
commit c543b36bde

View File

@@ -169,6 +169,6 @@ $$
Figure 1 plots $$L_{\text{Uniswap}}$$ against $$r$$ (which is proportional to $$p$$) regarding various levels of $$t$$. When $$0<t<1$$, $$L_{\text{Uniswap}}$$ is symmetric around 0% at which the maximum reaches . This is because
1. $$\cosh\left[(\frac{r(1-t)}{2})\right]$$ is symmetric around $$r$$= 0% with minimum at 0% and the minimum value 1;
2. $$x^z$$ is a decreasing function of $$x$$ when $$x$$ is positive and power $$z$$ is negative. In our case, we have $$z=-2+t1-t<-1$$. Therefore, it is the maximum rather than minimum that $$L_{\text{Uniswap}}$$ achieves at 0.
2. $$x^z$$ is a decreasing function of $$x$$ when $$x$$ is positive and power $$z$$ is negative. In our case, we have $$z=\frac{-2+t}{1-t}<-1$$. Therefore, it is the maximum rather than minimum that $$L_{\text{Uniswap}}$$ achieves at 0.
Furthermore, the higher the $$t$$, the flatter the liquidity distribution is. When $$t$$ approaches 1, i.e. AMM converges to the constant product formula, the liquidity distribution is close to a flat line. When $$t$$ approaches 0, the distribution concentrates around 0%.