mirror of
https://github.com/zhigang1992/RestKit.git
synced 2026-05-04 20:41:18 +08:00
Added support for polymorphic object mapping (Github #105, #244). This enables you to dynamically map objects to different destination classes or using different mapping strategies via configuration or callbacks. See Docs/Object Mapping.md for details.
Other changes include: * Eliminated the RKObjectFactory protocol and implementations. Object mapping instances themselves are now responsible for instantiating target objects for mapping. * Introduced RKObjectAbstractMapping superclass for RKObjectMapping and RKObjectPolymorphicMapping. * Updated example applications to use block object loaders (RKTwitter and RKTwitterCoreData) * Refactored method signatures of RKObjectMapper, RKObjectMapping, and RKObjectMappingProvider to reflect the existence of abstract mapping types. This was necessary to make polymorphic mappings integrate cleanly. * Fixed overlap in RestKit error domains between network and object mapping. fixes #208
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,8 +9,9 @@
|
||||
#import "../Support/Errors.h"
|
||||
|
||||
typedef enum RKObjectMapperErrors {
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorObjectMappingNotFound, // No mapping found
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorObjectMappingTypeMismatch, // Target class and object mapping are in disagreement
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorUnmappableContent, // No mappable attributes or relationships were found
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorFromMappingResult
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorObjectMappingNotFound = 1001, // No mapping found
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorObjectMappingTypeMismatch = 1002, // Target class and object mapping are in disagreement
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorUnmappableContent = 1003, // No mappable attributes or relationships were found
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorFromMappingResult = 1004, // The error was returned from the mapping result
|
||||
RKObjectMapperErrorValidationFailure = 1005 // Generic error code for use when constructing validation errors
|
||||
} RKObjectMapperErrorCode;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user